Tuesday, October 15, 2013

A Donkey in Fox’s Clothing?

Megyn Kelly giving a standup news report from the floor of the Republican National Convention in 2012.
Megyn Kelly's new Fox nightly news program, The Kelly File, premiered last week.

Photo courtesy Matt Gagnon/Creative Commons








Fox News anchor Megyn Kelly was the biggest winner of election night 2012 who was not running for public office. That evening, after Fox analysts had called Ohio and the election for President Obama, Karl Rove infamously began to express doubts about the results. In what is the only bit of television theater from that night anyone will ever remember, Kelly, who was co-anchoring Fox’s coverage, was tapped to question the decision desk directly, and she gamely stalked the halls of Fox News to authoritatively question the stat wonks who had made the call. (A Fox insider told New York’s Gabe Sherman about Kelly’s walk, “This is Fox News, so anytime there’s a chance to show off Megyn Kelly’s legs they’ll go for it.”) “We are actually quite comfortable with the call in Ohio,” one of the analysts told Kelly. This was not sufficient to convince Rove, who attempted a sort of one-man filibuster on the election results, such a blatant flouting of fact that it made Kelly’s earlier question to Rove seem prescient. “Is this just math you do as a Republican to make yourself feel better,” she had asked, “or is it real?”










And thus, the dueling legends of Megyn Kelly were born: Kelly the unflappable, impeccable Fox News star, and Kelly the unflappable, impeccable Fox News star who maybe knows Fox News is crazy. While nearly everyone around her lost their senses, Kelly remained the perfectly poised adult: gracefully navigating a contentious situation, upholding the integrity of Fox News without alienating conservative powerhouses, and making captivating television all the while.










That night, Fox saw an anchor they should commit to. The Kelly File, her new nightly news program, started last week and makes her Fox’s first new host since 2003. It airs directly following The O'Reilly Factor, and after just two episodes, it’s become the most watched show in the demo on cable news.











Willa Paskin is Slate’s television critic.












That night last fall, liberals also saw someone to admire. Kelly’s assured handling of Rove’s temper tantrum solidified her burgeoning reputation as the Fox News anchor who, when push came to Karl Rove’s shoving, would behave like a member of the reality-based community. If she was not quite a donkey in Fox’s clothing, maybe she wasn’t a party-line ideologue in one either.










Kelly has set herself apart by doing things Fox News personalities don’t usually do: She had issued a skillful and fast correction to Fox’s missed call on the Affordable Care Act, she “destroyed” a conservative who had called her maternity leave “a racket,” and she had taken her colleagues to task for disparaging families in which women are the primary breadwinner. Writing about that last incident on The New Yorker’s website, Amy Davidson—while complimentarily calling Kelly “the brains of the Fox News operation”—noted that Kelly “does not describe herself as a feminist, which may be why it’s all the more fascinating when, every now and then, she decides to act like what others might describe as one.” Kelly, to put a spin on an old cliché, is the Fox News host liberal women would most like to have a glass of sav blanc with.










That is, until they watch an episode of The Kelly File. One week into the show’s run, it is clear that to understand Kelly as anything other than a dedicated Fox News shill is a deluded fantasy. It is, to paraphrase Kelly herself, just wishful thinking you do as a Democrat to make yourself feel better. The skills that Kelly displayed on election night are real: She really is smarter, more appealing, and more polished than any other Fox News personality—none of which obviates her totally pernicious dedication to keeping Fox viewers within the Fox bubble, facts be damned.










For instance, watching The Kelly File, you would think the Republicans were more popular than the president. Since her new show has been on air, Kelly has never willingly shared the terrible approval ratings of Republicans in Congress, though she has vociferously supplied Obama’s low approval ratings and the low approval ratings of Congress as a whole.  In its first week, The Kelly Files has been fixated on how the shutdown was briefly keeping death benefits from soldiers who have died since the government closed. In the post-Benghazi era, this means determining “when” Barack Obama “knew” that families were being denied benefits, and when he decided to “do something” about it, even though the problem was brought up and addressed in a matter of days. Kelly aired a “gotcha” clip of Fox’s Ed Henry grilling Press Secretary Jay Carney that is downright Rorschachian: It looks to me like the White House dealt with the issue as quickly as possible, but looks to Fox News like a White House cover-up.










Nearly all the stories on The Kelly File turn on wedge social issues. A segment about a teenager who was returned to a house with a sex offender in it made it to air because the girl was allegedly being forced to have an abortion. There was a piece about the war on Christmas. A sequence about the 1980s killing of a DEA agent got play because the Obama administration has not protested the release of his killer from Mexican prison strongly enough. Kelly, her head, as usual, cocked slightly to the left to indicate deep listening, calmly took in a guest explaining that the Democrats don’t want to talk with Republicans because you “never have a real conversation with your adversary, it humanizes them,” before, seconds later, quoting Lenin: “Socialized medicine is the keystone to the arch of the socialist state.”










But then there are moments when Kelly exhibits her no-nonsense charm. In a segment on Las Vegas union workers hurling insults at tourists, a panelist said that Obama and Harry Reid have called people worse names in just the last few days, suggesting that such abuse and violence was typical of the left. At this, Kelly intervened, a little sarcastically. “You have maybe overstated your case. I don’t think we want to dismiss the entire left in the country as violent,” she said. Then she added, “I will say in [the union’s] defense that one time one guy parked me in and I could not get out of my car on either side, and I put a little note on his car and all I wrote on it was ‘Loser!’ And it made me feel so much better. And maybe they are experiencing the same thing. It was very cathartic for me. I cop to it.”










This may be a silly story, but I found it charming—and also terrifyingly savvy. Kelly dropped this anecdote into one of the least contentious stories she aired last week. (Even the Democrat on the panel thought cursing at tourists wasn’t a great strategy.) It burnishes her reputation as something other than a Fox automaton, without alienating any Fox partisans (it’s a cute story). Megyn Kelly has convinced both the right and the left that she’s a bold truth-teller because of her willingness to call bullshit one out of the 100 times bullshit should actually could be called.










Kelly is, in a way, like Laura Bush, a likeable woman who once evinced a leftish streak—voting Democrat before her marriage—that allowed liberals to project upon her a more palatable politics, a flight of fancy that inspired an entire novel.  Every single day, Kelly demonstrates her devotion to Fox News ideology. But because the only tidbits that regularly reach non-Fox News watchers are viral videos of Kelly doing something rare for a Fox News anchor—pointing out that all liberals are not violent, say, or arguing maternity leave is good—liberals can harbor the fantasy that Megyn Kelly might be that mythical being: A Fox News anchor to disagree with only some of the time. It’s not true, but it’s a very comforting to believe, because Megyn Kelly is going to be with us for a very long while.








Source: http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/television/2013/10/megyn_kelly_is_not_a_liberal_the_kelly_report_on_fox_news_reviewed.html
Category: burn notice   michael beasley   Manny Diaz   Tami Erin   chris brown  

Funds for iOS lets you get a glimpse of where your money goes, tracks what you're saving

Funds for iOS lets you get a glimpse of where your money goes, track what you're saving

Funds for iOS is a minimalist budget app that allows you to input how much you earn and how much you spend. From there, you can see a simple breakdown of what percentage of your income goes to different expenses as well as how much you're saving each month.

There isn't anything complicated or advanced about Funds but it does effectively provide an overall picture of your financial situation. Once you've told Funds how much you make and what your fixed expenses each month are, you're given an idea as to how you're doing. The color scheme will even change given how much you've got left to budget for the rest of the month.

Sliding to the right over any expense or income item will delete it from Funds. Slide to the left and you can quickly view what percentage of your overall income is being allocated to that type of expense. Tapping the menu button in the bottom right will show you a graph view of the same data.

Funds isn't over complicated by any means but what it can do is give a good overall snapshot of your current financial situation. That means you can make some educated decisions moving forward about what you should and can cut back on to save more money. If you're having issues saving money or can't quite pinpoint where your money is going, Funds can help you figure that out.


    






Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheIphoneBlog/~3/mg_dGZXPFv4/story01.htm
Tags: calvin johnson   Mike Wayans   Allegiant Air   princess diana   Erwin Schrödinger  

Blessing of pets honor St. Francis - Livingston County News

[unable to retrieve full-text content]A pony named Blue was joined by the Chinese dwarf hamsters, Eleanor and Sephera, a large goldfish named Voldermort and more than a dozen dogs at St. Agnes School on Friday afternoon. Gabriel Cote of Livonia shows ...Source: http://thelcn.com/2013/10/13/blessing-of-pets-honor-st-francis/
Tags: eric decker   survivor   Voyager 1   michael beasley   new york times  

Weight Watchers better than self-help for weight loss


By Andrew M. Seaman


NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Compared to going it alone, using the Weight Watchers diet program helps people shed extra pounds, says a new study.


What's more, the company-sponsored study found the more frequently people used Weight Watchers tools, the more weight they lost.


"The people who were most engaged were the people who did best in the program," Craig Johnston, the study's lead author from the Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, said.


Past research found the program, which is known for its point system and meetings, helps people lose weight. But a new website and mobile application needed a closer look, Johnston and his colleagues write in The American Journal of Medicine.


The researchers recruited 292 overweight and obese adults from the Danbury, Connecticut area and randomly split them into two groups.


People in one group were given publicly available printed materials about how to lose weight. The others received access to the Weight Watchers program at no cost.


Those given access to Weight Watchers could attend weekly meetings and use the company's interactive website and mobile app. They were encouraged to use all three tools to reach their weight loss goal.


The researchers had six months of data on 257 of the study's participants.


They found people enrolled in Weight Watchers lost an average of about 5 percent of their starting body weight - around 10 pounds. That compared to an average weight loss of less than 1 percent among those in the self-help group, or just over one pound.


Participants who used the Weight Watchers program tools the most ended up losing the most weight.


For example, those who attended more than half of the weekly meetings and accessed the website and app more than twice a week lost an average of 19 pounds. That compared to about 9 pounds of weight loss among those who heavily used one of the three tools.


"Having options to choose how you get that info and support is absolutely key," Hayden Bosworth said. He studies treatment adherence but wasn't involved with the new study.


"It makes a lot of sense, the results that I saw here," Bosworth, from Duke University Medical Center in Durham, North Carolina, told Reuters Health.


He said Weight Watchers may help people stay engaged, compared to just getting an initial push from a doctor.


"We know what to do, but we need help with getting it done. That's one of the reasons that Weight Watchers works really well," Johnston said.


He added, however, that it would be interesting to see how it stacks up against other weight loss programs.


"Would they do better or worse? I don't have the data on that," he told Reuters Health.


Bosworth said he's familiar with a weight management program from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs known as MOVE! The results from that program are not as impressive.


He said there could be differences in the programs themselves or the people who sign up for them. For example, people who do Weight Watchers may be more motivated because they typically pay for the program.


Currently, access to the Weight Watchers meetings, website and app costs about $43 per month.


SOURCE: http://bit.ly/1hRLfWb The American Journal of Medicine, online October 15, 2013.



Source: http://news.yahoo.com/weight-watchers-better-self-help-weight-loss-041305304.html
Tags: revenge   Kenichi Ebina   Lady Gaga Applause   gold cup   Deanna Burditt  

Major 7.2 magnitude quake strikes Philippines


Manila (AFP) - A major 7.2 magnitude earthquake struck near one of the Philippines key tourist hubs on Tuesday, the United States Geological Survey reported.


The quake struck at 08:12 local time (0012 GMT) some five kilometres (three miles) east of Balilihan, in the Bohol region of the archipelago, at a depth of 56 kilometres, the agency said.


The town lies across the Cebu Strait from the popular tourist destination of Cebu City, the country's fifth most populous city, about 60 kilometres (37 miles) away.


USGS issued a yellow warning, after the quake saying "some casualties and damage are possible and the impact should be relatively localised. Past yellow alerts have required a local or regional level response."


The temblor was followed by two aftershocks, each measuring more than 5.0 in magnitude.


The Pacific Tsunami Warning Center did not issue a Pacific-wide tsunami threat and there were no immediate reports of casualties or damage.


The epicentre was 629 kilometres from the capital Manila.


Balilihan has a population of around 18,500, according to the town's official website.


The Philippines lies on the so-called Pacific ring of fire, a chain of islands that are prone to quakes and volcanic eruptions.



Source: http://news.yahoo.com/major-7-2-magnitude-quake-strikes-philippines-usgs-010613045.html
Similar Articles: Kendrick Johnson   Star Trek Into Darkness   labor day   Chelsea Manning   Chucho Benitez  

Sunday, October 13, 2013

Debt Ceiling Increase Divides GOP On Obamacare - Business Insider

John Boehner

AP


Republicans are slowly coming around to the possibility of a short-term, six-week-or-so debt-ceiling increase that would allow for negotiations among congressional Republicans, Democrats, and President Barack Obama.


But they're doing so for very different reasons. In many ways, this plan has split the GOP, again, on the issue of Obamacare.


Conservatives want to increase the debt ceiling in the short term to focus the fight on the continuing resolution and on the issue of defunding, delaying, or at least making significant changes to the Affordable Care Act. More establishment Republicans want to move on from Obamacare, as they always have, realizing that it is perhaps a losing issue.


A House GOP leadership aide told Business Insider that "a lot of members like some version of the idea" of a six-week solution.


Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), the chair of the House Budget Committee, exemplifies the case of the establishment. He wrote an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal on Tuesday that rankled conservatives, because it did not once mention Obamacare.


Instead, as Ryan expanded on Wednesday, it advocates focusing on entitlement reform in subsequent talks with Obama on long-term fiscal issues. Ryan mentioned trading some entitlement reform for the repeal of certain sequestration cuts in his op-ed. 


Some conservatives aren't on board with that plan. Take RedState editor Erick Erickson, who accused House Republicans of preparing to "give up" on Thursday:


Cantor, Boehner, and with them Mitch McConnell and John Cornyn are expected to cave in and fully fund, unimpeded, Obamacare.


They will work up a new deal that includes a debt ceiling increase with a few sops to the GOP as cover. The only change they are still considering it the medical device tax repeal, which is being heavily lobbied for by former Boehner and McConnell staffers who left for K Street.


Erickson went on to say that the debate could "sow the seeds of real third party movement that will fully divide the Republican Party."


Heritage Action and FreedomWorks, two leading conservative groups, also backed away from a debt ceiling fight on Wednesday. But their reasoning echoed Erickson: They want to put focus back to the government-funding fight and Obamacare, and leave room for a debt-ceiling fight later this year.


Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), the original leader of the "defund Obamacare" effort, hasn't made any public comments about his thoughts on these reports. His office didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. 


But Amanda Carpenter, Cruz's senior communications director, was not a fan of Ryan's op-ed.



A group of 18 House Republicans are meeting with President Barack Obama at the White House on Thursday amid the ongoing debates on funding the government and raising the nation's debt ceiling.



Source: http://www.businessinsider.com/debt-ceiling-increase-obamacare-defund-delay-boehner-obama-shutdown-2013-10
Similar Articles: What Time Does Ios 7 Come Out   Pretty Little Liars   Allegiant Air   ryan braun   royal baby  

Friday, October 11, 2013

Instagram update coming to Android, brings photo straightening and new video controls

instagram on iOS

Straighten things out with the latest Instagram update for Android

If you've been wanting to straighten all those slightly crooked pictures your posting to Instagram from your Android, you'll be able to soon. An update is rolling out for Android that brings the straighten control and new sound and data usage controls to videos to the popular photo-sharing app. Users on iOS have had access to this for a while, and now the apps are on equal footing from a feature standpoint. 

You can check the Google Play link above to see if the update is available for you. If not, it should be soon as the folks at Instagram say it's coming today.

Source: @Instrgram


    






Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/androidcentral/~3/fZ__wfL1r-A/story01.htm
Similar Articles: emmys   Talk Like a Pirate Day   grand theft auto 5   Nothing Was The Same   kim zolciak